- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 360
Some of you may think this should have been posted in this other Canadian carrier thread: http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/36077.15.html
However, I think posting this in a thread of its own would get my question more readily answered.
When the RCN, RCAF and the Canadian Army were unified into CF in the late 1960s, I am assuming that HMCS Bonaventure had at least one year in CF service after that unification. After she had finished her mid 1960s refit, she continued her role as an ASW carrier, according to this source:
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/canada.htm#cvl22
However, since she was retired in 1970, this makes me wonder what would have happened to the naval aircrews aboard her if they were integrated into Aircom before her retirement? I assume they were recognized as air force squadrons (of detachments thereof). Still would their highest ranking Aircom officer be a Colonel or a Lt. Col.? (This is considering that many US Navy CAGs on their carriers hold the rank of O-6/Captain or O-5 Commander.) This would a strange arrangement to me, since this is the first time instance I aware of in the world where Air Force planes operated off a Navy carrier on a more permanent basis.
One exception to this would be the RAF and the RN having the Joint Force Harrier unit, but am not sure how frequently RAF Harriers get based on RN Fleet Carriers.
If ever Canada and Marcom ever sees a need for carriers in the next 50 years and are able to raise the appropriate budget for it, this makes me wonder how an Aircom squadron will be organized on a such a carrier- this will be nothing like the small Aircom Sea King detachments on the Destroyers and Frigates nowadays.
On a sidenote, how did the Marcom and the British Royal Navy initially decide how who became the skippers of carriers? This baffles me because I used the USN as a reference, since it was usually a CAG or at least any O-6 with flight experienc who became a Carrier's CO. If Marcom had continued operating carriers in the 70s, would that mean a CF Aircom Colonel would be more qualified to command a carrier than any MARS/surface warfare officer back then?
Any thoughts anyone?
However, I think posting this in a thread of its own would get my question more readily answered.
When the RCN, RCAF and the Canadian Army were unified into CF in the late 1960s, I am assuming that HMCS Bonaventure had at least one year in CF service after that unification. After she had finished her mid 1960s refit, she continued her role as an ASW carrier, according to this source:
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/canada.htm#cvl22
However, since she was retired in 1970, this makes me wonder what would have happened to the naval aircrews aboard her if they were integrated into Aircom before her retirement? I assume they were recognized as air force squadrons (of detachments thereof). Still would their highest ranking Aircom officer be a Colonel or a Lt. Col.? (This is considering that many US Navy CAGs on their carriers hold the rank of O-6/Captain or O-5 Commander.) This would a strange arrangement to me, since this is the first time instance I aware of in the world where Air Force planes operated off a Navy carrier on a more permanent basis.
One exception to this would be the RAF and the RN having the Joint Force Harrier unit, but am not sure how frequently RAF Harriers get based on RN Fleet Carriers.
If ever Canada and Marcom ever sees a need for carriers in the next 50 years and are able to raise the appropriate budget for it, this makes me wonder how an Aircom squadron will be organized on a such a carrier- this will be nothing like the small Aircom Sea King detachments on the Destroyers and Frigates nowadays.
On a sidenote, how did the Marcom and the British Royal Navy initially decide how who became the skippers of carriers? This baffles me because I used the USN as a reference, since it was usually a CAG or at least any O-6 with flight experienc who became a Carrier's CO. If Marcom had continued operating carriers in the 70s, would that mean a CF Aircom Colonel would be more qualified to command a carrier than any MARS/surface warfare officer back then?
Any thoughts anyone?