McG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 3,078
- Points
- 1,160
The example that you are asking about refers to a standard "force employment" model sqn. This implies that the four sections are complete (however with the promised growth, I've heard that the "force generation" model has grown to include four fd sect per fd tp). I've attached a picture below that shows the "standard" FE sqn on the left, and the "two half-troop" model on the right. (I'd be interested on Sapper6 or Chimo's opinion based on their experience with a similar structure for Op APOLLO).
As an aside, I've notice that much of 1 CER's transformation has been done through growth authorized when the SORD (04/05 I think) directed the establishment of an Armd Sqn. There are now Veh in the unit for that sqn, and I assume additional PYs. The Engrs have a coherent plan to support Army Transformation (and despite its problems, I think it is the best COA). When will this plan be articulated in a SORD so that the rest of the Army (and even CF) can get behind it?
As an aside, I've notice that much of 1 CER's transformation has been done through growth authorized when the SORD (04/05 I think) directed the establishment of an Armd Sqn. There are now Veh in the unit for that sqn, and I assume additional PYs. The Engrs have a coherent plan to support Army Transformation (and despite its problems, I think it is the best COA). When will this plan be articulated in a SORD so that the rest of the Army (and even CF) can get behind it?